Aims: To compare the intravascular ultrasound virtual histology (IVUS-VH) appearance of the polymeric struts of the first (Revision 1.0) and the second (Revision 1.1) generation bioresorbab
Salvatore Brugaletta1, MD; Hector M. Garcia-Garcia1, MD, PhD; Roberto Diletti1, MD; Josep Gomez-Lara1, MD; Scot Garg1, MBChB, MRCP; Yoshinobu Onuma1, MD; Eun-Seok Shin1, MD, PhD; Robert Jan van Geuns1, MD, PhD; Bernard de Bruyne2, MD; Dariusz Dudek3, MD; Leif Thuesen4, MD; Bernard Chevalier5, MD; Dougal McClean6, MD; Stephan Windecker7, MD, PhD; Robert Whitbourn8, MD; Cecile Dorange9, MSc; Susan Veldhof9, RN; Richard Rapoza10, PhD; Krishnankutty Sudhir
1. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2.Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Belgium; 3. Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland; 4. Department of Cardiology, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!Create my pcr account
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
bioresorbable vascular scaffoldintravascular ultrasound virtual histology
Read next articleRenal insufficiency following contrast media administration trial II (REMEDIAL II): RenalGuard system in high-risk patients for contrast-induced acute kidney injury: rationale and design