Articles | EuroIntervention

Snapshot

Sep 1, 2025

Chest pain and coronary microvascular dysfunction; the Dan-NICAD study; angiographic microcirculatory resistance; hepatic artery denervation; acute coronary syndromes in the elderly; tip-in balloon grenadoplasty; and more

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00037 • Sep 1, 2025

Angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction: unravelling the links

Berry C, Hanna R

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00045 • Sep 1, 2025

Angiographic-based assessment of microvascular dysfunction: quo vadis?

Bourantas C, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia H, Serruys P

free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00277 • Sep 1, 2025

Chest pain patterns and coronary microvascular function in non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Nogami K, Kanaji Y, Toya T, Singh Sara J, Raphael C, Gulati R, Prasad A, Kakuta T, Lerman L, Lerman A

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-01155 • Sep 1, 2025

Coronary microvascular disease in patients referred to coronary angiography following coronary computed tomography angiography

Westra J, Rasmussen L, Karim S, Jensen R, Ejlersen J, Gormsen L, Bøttcher M, Eftekhari A, Winther S, Christiansen E

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00952 • Sep 1, 2025

Single-view angiographic microcirculatory resistance index after primary PCI: the EARLY-MYO-AMR study

Zhang Z, Ding S, Guo Q, Ma C, Lin F, Rao X, Shi Q, Gao Y, Liu K, Yu H, Nie M, Liu C, Li S, Gao Y, Gao H, Peng L, Zhao Z, Zhao K, Tang H, You R, Zhang M, Pu J, LI M

open access

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00349 • Sep 1, 2025

A preclinical study of combined hepatic and renal artery denervation

Mahfoud F, Tunev S, Kandzari D, Secemsky E, Taub P, Voora R, Lauder L, Ryan C, Trudel J, Hettrick D, Schlaich M

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00147 • Sep 1, 2025

A Bayesian analysis of invasive treatment strategies for elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes

Siontis G, Efthimiou O

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-01022 • Sep 1, 2025

Tip-in balloon grenadoplasty for uncrossable chronic total occlusions

Achim A, Cocoi M

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00463 • Sep 1, 2025

Letter: When gradients diverge: integrating invasive assessment into post-TAVI surveillance

Skalidis I, Cook S, Garot P, Akodad M

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00826 • Aug 30, 2025

Effect of beta blocker withholding or withdrawal after myocardial infarction without reduced ejection fraction on ischaemic events: a post hoc analysis from the REBOOT trial

Rossello X, Sánchez P, Owen R, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Poletti F, Barrabés J, Anguita M, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Lombardi M, Pocock S, Díez-Villanueva P, Vives-Borras M, Rollán M, D’Orazio S, Escalera N, Isabel-Santos A, Chiampan A, de Diego O, López-Benito M, Moreno E, Rincón-Díaz L, París H, Latini R, Fuster V, Ibáñez B

free

Intro editorial

• Aug 18, 2025

Cardiogenic shock in women; PCSK9 inhibitors and non-culprit lesions; coronary microvascular dysfunction; residual shunt after PFO closure; the SESAME technique; TAVI in pure aortic regurgitation; design of the ALL-RISE trial; 3-year results from BIOMAG-I; scaffold therapy for infrapopliteal disease; carbon footprint of an angiogram; the Cathpax AIR cabin; and more

Capodanno D

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00036 • Aug 18, 2025

“He who has eyes to see, let him see”

Garcia-Garcia H

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00025 • Aug 18, 2025

Does a positive bubble study after PFO closure matter: is it much ado about nothing or an indication for reintervention?

Horlick E, Abrahamyan L

free

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-01126 • Aug 18, 2025

SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women

Baron S, Chou J, Shah T, Vest A, Abbott JD, Alasnag M, Aurigemma C, Barbato E, Bellumkonda L, Bortnick A, Chieffo A, van Geuns R, Grines C, Halvorsen S, Hassager C, Kapur N, Naidu S, Ng V, Saw J, Lansky A

free