Trial Design

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01090

Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo-surgical valve replacement for mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: rationale and design of the SURVIV randomised trial

Dimytri A. Siqueira1, MD, PhD; Alexandre A.C. Abizaid2, MD, PhD; Auristela A. Ramos1, MD, PhD; Mario Issa1, MD, PhD; Alberto C. Cervone1, MD; Cristiano G. Bezerra3, MD, PhD; Breno Alencar de Araripe Falcão4, MD, PhD; Leandro A. Cortes5, MD; Leonardo de Freitas C. Guimarães6, MD, PhD; Luiz Eduardo K. São Thiago7, MD, PhD; Mariana Rezende1, MD; Tacianne Rolemberg Delamain1, MD; Dorival Della Togna1, MD, PhD; Jorge E. Assef1, MD, PhD; Andrea A. Vilela1, MD, PhD; Antonio Tito Paladino1, MD, PhD; Ibraim M. Pinto1, MD, PhD; Kleber Franchini1, MD, PhD; Deepak L. Bhatt8, MD, MPH, MBA; Fausto Feres1, MD, PhD

Abstract

Bioprosthetic mitral valves are prone to structural valve deterioration (SVD) over time, which can lead to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) requiring reintervention. Surgical redo-mitral valve replacement (rMVR) is currently the standard treatment, although it is associated with significant mortality in high-risk patients. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (mViV) has emerged as an alternative to surgical rMVR in patients with failed bioprostheses, but randomised studies comparing the two treatments are lacking. The SURVIV trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial that will enrol 150 patients with mitral BVD suitable for surgical rMVR or transcatheter mViV. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to transseptal mViV with a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve or to conventional surgical rMVR. Procedures will be performed according to local best practices with contemporary medical devices. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints are major complications (cardiovascular death, disabling stroke, life-threatening or major bleeding, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3, and major vascular complications) at 30 days, according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria; rehospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 12 months; echocardiographic and/or tomographic signs of prosthetic valve thrombosis and early SVD at 3 and 12 months; and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 3 and 12 months. Clinical follow-up will continue up to 10 years. SURVIV is the first randomised trial to compare a transcatheter mViV procedure with surgical rMVR for mitral BVD and may provide further clinical evidence to guide the management of patients with failed mitral bioprostheses. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04402931.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 6
Mar 16, 2026
Volume 22 Number 6
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01037 Aug 21, 2023
Clinical outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: two-year results of the CHOICE-MI Registry
Ludwig S et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I17A252 Apr 20, 2021
How to eliminate mitral regurgitation definitively: the eternal dilemma?
Modine T and Ben Ali W
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01008 Apr 20, 2021
Clinical impact of intervention strategies after failed transcatheter mitral valve repair
Alessandrini H et al
free

10.4244/EIJV14I12A223 Dec 20, 2018
Transcatheter mitral valve repair: a step back from the edge
Mylotte D and Søndergaard L
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved