Reply to the letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00594

Reply: Identifying vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques: from theory to practice

David del Val1,2, MD, PhD; Fernando Alfonso1,2, MD, PhD; Elvin Kedhi3,4, MD, PhD; on behalf of the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial investigators

We sincerely appreciate Dr Dimitriadis and colleagues’ interest in our study1, which aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of vulnerable plaque features in predicting the incidence of the lesion-oriented composite endpoint in fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative non-culprit lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus2. The authors have rightly highlighted the demonstrated benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in plaque regression and stabilisation, which recent studies have associated with reduced adverse outcomes3. Although we share the authors’ enthusiasm for these potent cholesterol-lowering therapies, it is important to note that the first PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab) received European Commission approval for reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in 2018 and 2019, respectively. However, our study analysed patients enrolled between 2015 and 2018, a period preceding the widespread use of these therapies. Currently, the COMBINE-INTERVINE randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05333068) is enrolling patients and will likely include a substantial proportion of patients receiving novel low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering pharmacotherapies, such as PCSK9 inhibitors and therapies based on small interfering ribonucleic acid technology. We are convinced...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 16
Aug 19, 2024
Volume 20 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

10.4244/EIJV13I16A304 Mar 20, 2018
STEMI – are we there yet?
Gershlick A
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01124 Apr 17, 2020
The year in review: coronary interventions
Gao C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I6A125 Oct 25, 2013
Mislabelled table entries in ADVISE Registry by Petraco and colleagues
Johnson NP et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00011 Mar 18, 2022
Another way to measure the progress of PCI
King S
free
Trending articles
202.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
160.58

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00725 Jan 23, 2023
Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
Hausleiter J et al
free
75.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
70.2

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00763 Dec 18, 2020
Twelve-month clinical and imaging outcomes of the uncaging coronary DynamX bioadaptor system
Verheye S et al
free
58.35

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00975 May 16, 2021
Revascularisation or medical therapy in elderly patients with acute anginal syndromes: the RINCAL randomised trial
de Belder A et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved