DOI: 10.4244/EIJV13SAAA2

Percutaneous valve treatment, the younger brother of coronary angioplasty

Patrick W. Serruys, Editor in Chief, EuroIntervention

In September one of the most exciting meetings organised by the PCR group – PCR London Valves – will once again be taking place, and it is only fitting that we will celebrate the 15th anniversary of the first valve replacement (in conjunction with the 40th anniversary of the first percutaneous treatment) during our time together in London.

This dedicated EuroIntervention supplement, the perfect complement to the meeting itself, spotlights the progress we have made in the valvular field as described by top leaders and international experts and we are very pleased and extremely proud to introduce it.

You will find here a series of nine review articles covering all the major topics in this field. These include reviews of the state of the art individually focusing on the aortic1, mitral2,3 and tricuspid valves4, followed by a fine overview, the “big parade” on emerging devices for percutaneous mitral and tricuspid valves5. We have an historical account by Younes Boudjemline of the development of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation6. The supplement concludes with papers on restorative valve therapy by endogenous tissue restoration7, a state-of-the-art review on left atrial occlusion8 and another on imaging9.

Alain Cribier revolutionised the field of interventional cardiology in 1986 when he introduced balloon aortic valvuloplasty. At that time, the hype surrounding this new development in cardiology was tremendous, and the anticipation produced early disappointment when it became evident that the treatment was just a transient fix.

Yet, as a true pioneer, Alain Cribier did not accept that this was merely a failure of the device, but rather a personal failure. To counter this, he fought back as only a true inventor and pioneer could, by continuing to pursue his goal to convert this transient fix into a permanent solution.

His persistence and vision paid off and, in 2002, he ushered the interventional community into a new era – the era of valve replacement with an evolved approach encompassing a totally different environment from the first coronary balloon angioplasty. Treating an almost moribund patient on compassionate grounds and succeeding came as a shock to the entire community. Of course, some of our key opinion leaders said at the time that it would not work – that there was no way you could fix a stent cage in a calcified aortic valve and maintain the valve in the correct position. However, one by one these early doubters slowly came round, convinced of the good sense of this therapy and already, by the 2006/2007 EuroPCR, we could see the future potential for this technique.

Our first EuroIntervention supplement on percutaneous valves was guest edited by Alec Vahanian and Arie Pieter Kappetein. By 2006, the inventory of worldwide patients treated by percutaneous valve replacement amounted to around 667 patients. Ten to fifteen years later we are working in a completely different world where literally thousands of patients have benefited from this intervention. In addition, by a quick succession of well-conducted major randomised trials, we have moved from inoperable “compassionate grounds” patients to those at high risk to others at intermediate risk and now, finally, low risk.

The challenges, however, are still there, with durability being a complex issue. If we consider follow-up at five, 10 or 15 years, the process of durability in less elderly patients will be of major interest.

Soon after our focus on the aortic valve, interest shifted to the mitral valve, a field full of surprises and complexity. It is interesting to see that the so-called “forgotten valve”, the tricuspid, is in some ways making more progress than the mitral valve in this latest phase. As usual, PCR London Valves (previously called the “Annual Transcatheter Valve Symposium”) promises to be a very educational forum.

I want to take this opportunity to congratulate the current editors of this supplement – Corrado Tamburino, Marco Barbanti, Bernard Prendergast and Davide Capodanno – for their excellent work in collaborating and creating such a spectacular issue focusing on the past, present and future knowledge of these valves.

Earlier this year, we produced a special issue on coronary percutaneous angioplasty. It seems only fair – and immensely fitting – to create a tribute to the other major anniversary marking interventional cardiology, 15 years of percutaneous aortic valve therapy!


References

Volume 13 Supplement AA
Sep 24, 2017
Volume 13 Supplement AA
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01048 Apr 5, 2019
The evolution of device technology in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Bourantas C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12SYA5 Sep 18, 2016
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: there is still much to know
Tamburino C and Fajadet J
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00491 Dec 18, 2023
Catheter-based cardiovascular therapies: a seminal paradigm shift
Gaspard PE
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00636 Nov 18, 2022
In search of the origin of the acronym TAVI
Gaspard PE
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00656 Sep 7, 2018
Optimal structure of TAVI heart centres in 2018
Nerla R et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00567 Sep 24, 2017
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2017: state of the art
Barbanti M et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA33 Sep 17, 2015
Transfemoral TAVI devices: design overview and clinical outcomes
Abdel-Wahab M et al
free
Trending articles
337.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
283.98

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved