Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00175

Carbon footprint of diagnostic coronary angiography

Coralie Leiszt1, PharmD; Edouard Cheneau2, MD; Bruno Vahdat2, MD; Camille Strube2, MD; Melanie Thomas2; Damien Felix1, PharmD; Sarah Alessi1, PharmD; Omar Hanafia1, PharmD; Maud Saussereau3, MSc; Emilie Bialecki3, PhD; Vassili Panagides2, MD, PhD

Environmental concerns related to global warming impact all sectors of society, with healthcare contributing approximately 5% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – making it the 5th largest emitting entity on the planet. Annually, around 5 million cardiac catheterisation procedures are performed worldwide. Despite this, the healthcare sector is lagging in efforts to reduce GHG emissions, and there is a lack of detailed studies that accurately estimate the emissions generated by specific procedures1. Ditac et al reported that atrial fibrillation catheter ablation results in an average of 76.9 kg of carbon dioxide (CO2)-equivalent (CO2e) emissions, amounting to 125 tonnes of CO2e released daily2. Unfortunately, no studies have evaluated the carbon footprint of coronary angiography procedures. This work aims to estimate the overall and detailed carbon footprint of a coronary angiography procedure, with the goal of raising awareness among healthcare professionals and industry partners to reduce the GHG emissions associated with these procedures.

To conduct this study, we exhaustively catalogued all the equipment and treatments used during a standardised diagnostic coronary angiography procedure at our centre. After this, we...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 16
Aug 18, 2025
Volume 21 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00011 Apr 3, 2023
Robotics in interventional cardiology: a new era of safe and efficient procedures
Bruining N
free

10.4244/EIJV8I6A101 Oct 26, 2012
Radiation exposure as an occupational hazard
Picano E and Vano E
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01044 May 20, 2020
Radiation protection measures and sex distribution in European interventional catheterisation laboratories
Manzo-Silberman S et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13IZA2 May 15, 2017
Current trends in coronary interventions: an overview from the EAPCI registries
Barbato E et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00577 Jun 24, 2022
A novel robotic radiation shielding device for interventional cardiology procedures
Laish-Farkash A et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00528 Jun 25, 2020
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional cardiology practice: results of the EAPCI survey
Roffi M et al
free
Trending articles
95.7

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
66.55

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 May 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 Jul 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
35.45

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved