Viewpoint

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00335

Recyclable and contaminated waste from cardiac procedures: a call to action for a sustainable catheterisation laboratory and operating theatre

Haitham Amin1, MD, FSCAI, FACC, FRCPC; Nooraldaem Yousif1, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC; Thomas F. Lüscher2,3,4, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC

Globally, healthcare produces 4% to 5% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with a predicted 3-fold increase by 20501. The exponential growth of medical waste contributes to global carbon emissions and poses a significant challenge to environmental sustainability2. Hospitals contribute disproportionately to a substantial carbon footprint, especially in energy intensive areas such as radiology suites, operating rooms, and cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs). The number of cardiac procedures worldwide is increasing, with expanding medical facilities to cater for a growing population. Scarce attention has been given to quantifying and reducing waste from CCLs and cardiac operating theatres (COTs) to help lower the carbon footprint3.

Our CCLs and COTs have a routine waste management protocol in place: all contaminated waste gets collected in designated “yellow” bags, gets shredded, autoclaved, and then placed in disposal bags that go to landfills. Incineration of contaminated waste is another disposal route. Non-contaminated waste including paper, plastics, and cardboard boxes (packaging from balloon catheters, stents, guides etc.) are collected in “green” bags. All this potentially recyclable waste goes to landfills due to the lack of...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 16
Aug 19, 2024
Volume 20 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV10I4A71 Aug 19, 2014
Innovations: resetting our thinking to solve problems
Serruys PW
free

10.4244/EIJV9I2A28 Jun 28, 2013
Numbers needed to treat (lives!) and numbers needed to save (money)
Ribichini F et al
free

Jan 11, 2011
IVUS in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?
Trabattoni D and Bartorelli AL
free

Jan 11, 2011
How to solve difficult side branch access?
Burzotta F et al
free

May 25, 2010
Integrated anatomy and viability assessment PET-CT
Saraste A et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
43.4

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved