Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00018

Using pericoronary fat attenuation to guide management after coronary interventions

Charalambos Antoniades, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC; Kenneth Chan, MBBS, MRCP

Contemporary coronary intervention strategies primarily focus on anatomical obstructions and physiological flow limitations. In the context of chronic coronary syndromes, increasing clinical evidence has demonstrated that revascularising flow-limiting coronary obstructions does not substantially reduce the risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Furthermore, rehospitalisation due to a new acute coronary syndrome frequently occurs within the first year from a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) targeting flow-limiting plaque disease1. This underscores the unmet need to identify the non-obstructive vulnerable plaques, which could be treated to improve clinical outcomes, as demonstrated in the recent PREVENT trial2.

Inflammation is a critical process in both the development and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques3. Among patients undergoing routine clinical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), coronary inflammation can be non-invasively detected by mapping the radiological changes in the perivascular adipose tissue, and quantified using the fat attenuation index (FAI)-Score45. Indeed, the FAI-Score measured around any coronary artery demonstrated significant prognostic value among patients with or without obstructive coronary atherosclerosis in the ORFAN study6. Previous studies have demonstrated that pericoronary FAI7, or even...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 11
Jun 2, 2025
Volume 21 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00051 Jan 23, 2023
What makes a plaque rupture? A simple answer seems too much to ask for
Achenbach S
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00397 Oct 21, 2022
Skating on thin ice: searching for vulnerable plaques
Prati F et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00004 Mar 4, 2024
Prophylactic stenting of vulnerable plaques: pros and cons
Park D et al
free
Trending articles
310.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
92.2

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
76.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
35

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 May 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
26

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00535 May 5, 2025
Catheter-based techniques for pulmonary embolism treatment
Costa F et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved