Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00018

Using pericoronary fat attenuation to guide management after coronary interventions

Charalambos Antoniades, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC; Kenneth Chan, MBBS, MRCP

Contemporary coronary intervention strategies primarily focus on anatomical obstructions and physiological flow limitations. In the context of chronic coronary syndromes, increasing clinical evidence has demonstrated that revascularising flow-limiting coronary obstructions does not substantially reduce the risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Furthermore, rehospitalisation due to a new acute coronary syndrome frequently occurs within the first year from a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) targeting flow-limiting plaque disease1. This underscores the unmet need to identify the non-obstructive vulnerable plaques, which could be treated to improve clinical outcomes, as demonstrated in the recent PREVENT trial2.

Inflammation is a critical process in both the development and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques3. Among patients undergoing routine clinical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), coronary inflammation can be non-invasively detected by mapping the radiological changes in the perivascular adipose tissue, and quantified using the fat attenuation index (FAI)-Score45. Indeed, the FAI-Score measured around any coronary artery demonstrated significant prognostic value among patients with or without obstructive coronary atherosclerosis in the ORFAN study6. Previous studies have demonstrated that pericoronary FAI7, or even...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 11
Jun 2, 2025
Volume 21 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00051 Jan 23, 2023
What makes a plaque rupture? A simple answer seems too much to ask for
Achenbach S
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00397 Oct 21, 2022
Skating on thin ice: searching for vulnerable plaques
Prati F et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00387 Jul 21, 2025
Advances in coronary imaging of atherosclerotic plaques
Garcia-Garcia H et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00004 Mar 4, 2024
Prophylactic stenting of vulnerable plaques: pros and cons
Park D et al
free
Trending articles
95.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
76.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
63

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00074 Jun 3, 2022
Transcatheter aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation with the Cusper device
Feld Y et al
free
58.2

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
49.1

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 May 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
49.1

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 Jul 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
31.1

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00535 May 5, 2025
Catheter-based techniques for pulmonary embolism treatment
Costa F et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved