DOI:

SR200 MyoCath™ percutaneous microimplant delivery system

Howard Leonhardt*, Richard Spencer

Description

The SR200 MyoCath™ is a endoventricular needle-injection catheter utilizing catheter tip deflection technology and a adjustable depth, spring-loaded needle to provide multiple and precise delivery of biologic injectate to targeted myocardium.

History

MyoCath™ intellectual property was secured in 1999 and 2000. Initial prototypes were created and design was finalized in 2000. Bench testing, design control testing, biocompatibility/toxicity testing, thrombogenicity testing, in vitro testing and in vivo testing were all completed in 2001. MyoCath™ is manufactured in an ISO certified, class 100,000 controlled environment room and has been in clinical use since 2002.

Technical specifications

Indication for use

MyoCath™ is an investigational device indicated for injecting an aqueous solution or suspension, for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, into internal tissues or organs.

Tips and tricks for delivery (use)

– Use of a steerable guidewire is not required.

– Slight deflection of the catheter tip facilitates crossing the aortic valve when performing endoventricular injections.

– A 9F guide catheter can be used if additional back-up support is required to reach difficult areas (i.e. septal) of the left ventricle.

– During long procedures, flushing the catheter with cold saline restores torquability and back-up support.

– Using deliberate force to extend the needle and infusing the injectate slowly over several seconds helps to optimize channel creation and injectate retention in scarred areas of myocardium.

– PVCs and tactile feel will confirm presence of the needle against the myocardial wall.

– Mixing injectate with non-ionic contrast enhances visualization of injectate retention under fluoroscopy.

Preclinical experience

As part of the design validation effort, Bioheart, Inc. performed ten in vivo studies in the porcine model to assess performance and ease of use of the MyoCath™ in the hands of a number of experienced interventional cardiologists. The primary objective was to ensure the design is suitable for its intended use under simulated conditions in the animal model. Physicians rated the performance of the device using the following metrics:

– Device preparation

– Ease of access

– Ease of placement

– Needle core advancement / retraction

– Needle insertion / removal

– Device injection

– Device visualization

– Ease of removal

– Thrombogenicity

– Device integrity

– Overall performance

– Standard anticoagulation regime

– Comparison with standard practices

Overall, the physicians rated the MyoCath™ favorably and reported it performed in an acceptable manner.

Clinical experience

The MyoCath™ has been used in 25 clinical cases to-date. All clinical cases involved injections in chronically infracted left ventricles (septal, anterior and posterior locations were targeted). No adverse events related to MyoCath™ have ever been reported, and feedback captured from physicians following completion of these cases was highly positive.

Volume 1 Number 4
Feb 20, 2006
Volume 1 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00453 Jul 6, 2026
AnchorMan versus Watchman 2.5: a randomised comparison in left atrial appendage closure
Garot P and Nielsen-Kudsk J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00011 Jul 6, 2026
Comparing transcatheter aortic valves: time to look beyond simplistic categorisations
Blackman D and Maznyczka A
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00158 Jul 6, 2026
Prosthesis-patient mismatch with intra-annular self-expanding valves: an analysis of the PORTICO IDE trial
Fontana G et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00315 Jul 6, 2026
Validation of the VARC-HBR consensus for defining high bleeding risk in TAVI
Singh M et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00271 Jul 6, 2026
Outcomes of percutaneous mechanical aspiration in left-sided infective endocarditis
Lugo-Fagundo NS et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00128 Jul 6, 2026
Concomitant transfemoral aortic and mitral valve replacement
Lianos I et al
Trending articles
334.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
83.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
37.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
30.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved