DOI:

SR200 MyoCath™ percutaneous microimplant delivery system

Howard Leonhardt*, Richard Spencer

Description

The SR200 MyoCath™ is a endoventricular needle-injection catheter utilizing catheter tip deflection technology and a adjustable depth, spring-loaded needle to provide multiple and precise delivery of biologic injectate to targeted myocardium.

History

MyoCath™ intellectual property was secured in 1999 and 2000. Initial prototypes were created and design was finalized in 2000. Bench testing, design control testing, biocompatibility/toxicity testing, thrombogenicity testing, in vitro testing and in vivo testing were all completed in 2001. MyoCath™ is manufactured in an ISO certified, class 100,000 controlled environment room and has been in clinical use since 2002.

Technical specifications

Indication for use

MyoCath™ is an investigational device indicated for injecting an aqueous solution or suspension, for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, into internal tissues or organs.

Tips and tricks for delivery (use)

– Use of a steerable guidewire is not required.

– Slight deflection of the catheter tip facilitates crossing the aortic valve when performing endoventricular injections.

– A 9F guide catheter can be used if additional back-up support is required to reach difficult areas (i.e. septal) of the left ventricle.

– During long procedures, flushing the catheter with cold saline restores torquability and back-up support.

– Using deliberate force to extend the needle and infusing the injectate slowly over several seconds helps to optimize channel creation and injectate retention in scarred areas of myocardium.

– PVCs and tactile feel will confirm presence of the needle against the myocardial wall.

– Mixing injectate with non-ionic contrast enhances visualization of injectate retention under fluoroscopy.

Preclinical experience

As part of the design validation effort, Bioheart, Inc. performed ten in vivo studies in the porcine model to assess performance and ease of use of the MyoCath™ in the hands of a number of experienced interventional cardiologists. The primary objective was to ensure the design is suitable for its intended use under simulated conditions in the animal model. Physicians rated the performance of the device using the following metrics:

– Device preparation

– Ease of access

– Ease of placement

– Needle core advancement / retraction

– Needle insertion / removal

– Device injection

– Device visualization

– Ease of removal

– Thrombogenicity

– Device integrity

– Overall performance

– Standard anticoagulation regime

– Comparison with standard practices

Overall, the physicians rated the MyoCath™ favorably and reported it performed in an acceptable manner.

Clinical experience

The MyoCath™ has been used in 25 clinical cases to-date. All clinical cases involved injections in chronically infracted left ventricles (septal, anterior and posterior locations were targeted). No adverse events related to MyoCath™ have ever been reported, and feedback captured from physicians following completion of these cases was highly positive.

Volume 1 Number 4
Feb 20, 2006
Volume 1 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00648 Jul 20, 2026
When less is no longer more: very early aspirin discontinuation after ACS
Piccolo R and Vitale A
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00010 Jul 20, 2026
Aspirin withdrawal after primary PCI for STEMI: timing matters
Paradies V and Mancini G
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00715 Jul 20, 2026
Endotype-guided management of ANOCA: are we ready?
Montone R
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00148 Jul 20, 2026
Endotype-guided medical therapy and symptom response in ANOCA
Farina J et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01215 Jul 20, 2026
Prevalence of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with residual or recurrent angina after percutaneous coronary intervention
Crooijmans C et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00731 Jul 20, 2026
Collapse of a new-generation magnesium scaffold
Bastante T et al
Trending articles
335.05

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
49.35

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
45.5

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.15

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved