Trial Design

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00486

Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk elective PCI: rationale and design of the PROTECT IV trial

Norman Mangner1, MD; Samin K. Sharma2, MD; Chris O’Connor3, MD; Amir Kaki4, MD; George D. Dangas5,6, MD, PhD; Jeffrey W. Moses7, MD; Ehtisham Mahmud8, MD; Giuseppe Tarantini9, MD, PhD; Stephan Achenbach10, MD; Stuart J. Pocock11, PhD; William W. O’Neill12, MD; Cindy L. Grines13, MD; Alexandra J. Lansky14, MD; Jason R. Wollmuth15, MD; Jagat Narula16, MD, PhD; Dimitrios I. Karmpaliotis17, MD; Haroon A. Faraz18, MD; Mir B. Basir12, DO; Aditya S. Bharadwaj19, MD; Ziad A. Ali20, MD, DPhil; Chuck Simonton21, MD; Seth D. Bilazarian21, MD; Navin K. Kapur21, MD; Roberta C. Chapman21, MD; Dana Bentley21; Jeffrey J. Popma6, MD; Akiko Maehara6, MD; Stephan Windecker22, MD; Gregg W. Stone2, MD

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves long-term mortality in HFrEF. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed as an alternative to CABG in patients at high surgical risk. However, in patients with HFrEF and limited myocardial reserve, PCI may result in haemodynamic instability, increasing risk and precluding optimal revascularisation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk PCI may enhance haemodynamic stability during the procedure and enable complete revascularisation. We thus performed the PROTECT IV trial to determine whether PCI with routine use of the Impella CP microaxial flow pump improves early and late outcomes in patients with HFrEF and complex CAD compared with PCI with or without use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). PROTECT IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled, open-label, superiority trial with an adaptive design. Patients with complex CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (n=1,252) deemed at excessive surgical risk for bypass grafting by the Heart Team will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with Impella CP versus PCI with or without an IABP. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned clinically driven revascularisation, durable left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplant, or other hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 3-year follow-up, with at least 1-year follow-up in all patients. Prespecified substudies will evaluate the impact of MCS on renal function, the procedural role of right heart catheterisation, and the utility of myocardial viability assessment. The PROTECT IV trial will determine whether routine MCS with Impella CP during high-risk PCI improves the prognosis of patients with complex CAD and HFrEF.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 21
Nov 3, 2025
Volume 21 Number 21
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00044 May 10, 2024
Microaxial flow pump for high-risk PCI: are we ready for the prime time?
Thiele H and Perera D
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00279L Oct 18, 2019
Impella device use in high-risk PCI
Chhabra L et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00035 Dec 18, 2023
PCI has no role in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: pros and cons
Perera D et al
free

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00371 Feb 20, 2017
Pulsatile iVAC 2L circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
den Uil C et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
Trending articles
334.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
83.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
37.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
30.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved