Letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00714

Letter: Permanent pacing after TAVI for aortic regurgitation: distinctive predictors in a new landscape

Rafael Alessandro Ferreira Gomes1, MD, MSc, PhD; Fabiano Cantarelli Lima1, MD; Eduardo Pessoa de Melo1, MD; Jorge Augusto Nunes Guimarães1, MD, MSc, PhD

We congratulate Wienemann and colleagues on their important contribution to the field of structural heart interventions, reporting a 24.1% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in pure aortic regurgitation (AR) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the JenaValve Trilogy system (JenaValve Technology). As TAVI indications extend beyond aortic stenosis (AS), their study provides timely and clinically relevant insights into conduction disturbances in this unique patient population1. In AS, PPI post-TAVI is a well-recognised complication primarily driven by mechanical compression of the conduction system, particularly from deep valve implantation and radial force from self-expanding prostheses2. Large registries such as the STS/ACC TVT Registry consistently report PPI rates of ~10-11% in AS populations, despite ongoing improvements in device design and operator experience3. The NEOPRO and NEOPRO-2 registries (n=3,211) showed similar results, identifying right bundle branch block (RBBB) and depth of implantation as independent predictors of PPI4. These findings support the utility of mechanical and anatomical markers to guide risk prediction in TAVI for AS. In contrast, Wienemann et al identified only baseline conduction disturbances – first-degree...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 20
Oct 20, 2025
Volume 21 Number 20
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00339 Sep 2, 2024
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for native aortic valve regurgitation
Le Ruz R et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01060 Nov 15, 2019
Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors and long-term outcomes
Costa G et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00057 Feb 6, 2023
The scope of the evolution in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement technique
Attizzani G and Yoon S
free

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA11 Sep 18, 2016
Patient selection for TAVI in 2016: should we break through the low-risk barrier?
Abdelghani M and Serruys PW
free

10.4244/EIJV9SSA11 Sep 15, 2013
Native aortic valve regurgitation: transcatheter therapeutic options
Roy D et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved