Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00139

In-depth, patient-level analysis of clinical events in the NOTION-2 trial

Arif A. Khokhar1, BM BCh, MA; Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen1, MD, PhD; Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod1, MD, PhD; Lars Sondergaard2, MD, DMSc; Bernard Prendergast3, DM; Ole De Backer1,4, MD, PhD

The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention 2 (NOTION-2) trial was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in young, low surgical risk patients with severe tricuspid (N=270) and bicuspid (N=100) aortic stenosis (AS)1. The primary endpoint of the trial − a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke or rehospitalisation at 12 months − was comparable in tricuspid AS patients (TAVI: 8.7% vs SAVR: 8.3%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-2.3) but differed significantly in those with bicuspid AS (TAVI: 14.3% vs SAVR: 3.9%; HR 3.8, 95% CI: 0.8-18.5). These findings can only be considered hypothesis-generating owing to the relatively small sample size, but they raise important concerns as indications for TAVI expand to include younger patients in whom bicuspid AS is more frequently encountered. To address these concerns, we conducted an in-depth, patient-level analysis of individual trial participants who experienced cardiovascular (CV) mortality or stroke following either TAVI or SAVR (Figure 1), evaluating clinical characteristics, anatomical features determined from the preprocedural computed tomography (CT), and procedural...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 19
Oct 6, 2025
Volume 21 Number 19
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00869 Jan 20, 2025
TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: the Neo2 BAV Registry
Rück A et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00869 Nov 24, 2024
TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: the Neo2 BAV Registry
Rück A et al
free

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA10 Sep 18, 2016
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis
Perlman G et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00037 Aug 21, 2023
Bicuspid is different
Bleiziffer S
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00008 May 15, 2026
An unnecessary farewell? Drawing "accurate" lessons from DOUBLE-CHOICE
Blankenberg S and Ludwig S
free

10.4244/EIJV14I18A313 Apr 5, 2019
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at low surgical risk
Søndergaard L et al
free
Trending articles
334.8

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
202.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
33.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
27.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
27.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved