Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00820

Balloon compression or haemostatic patch after distal foot arterial access for lower limb angioplasty: the PED-PRESS trial

Róbert Bellavics1, MD; Sadeek Sidney Kanoun Schnur1,2, MBBCh, MRCP; Mónika Deák3, MD; Ádám Csavajda3, MD; Tak Kwan4, MD; Balázs Nemes5, MD, PhD; Csaba Lengyel1, MD, PhD; Judit Andreka1, MD; Jasjit S. Suri6,7,8,9, MD, DSc; Attila Nemes1,5, MD, DSc; Béla Merkely5, MD, DSc; Zoltan Ruzsa1,5, MD, PhD

Traditionally, lower-limb endovascular interventions have used transfemoral or transbrachial access. Alternative approaches such as transradial and distal foot artery (DFA) access are now, however, increasingly adopted12. DFA access (distal anterior tibial/dorsalis pedis, distal posterior tibial, and distal peroneal/perforator arteries) offers a smaller-calibre, superficial, and easily compressible artery, lowering access site bleeding complications2. Given the DFA’s small size, intravascular closure devices cannot be used; haemostasis relies on external compression. The standard method is manual compression, but dedicated devices are often employed for convenience. Two devices are commonly used: a balloon compression device (TR Band [Terumo]) originally designed for radial artery haemostasis3, and a topical haemostatic patch (StatSeal [Biolife]). StatSeal utilises a hydrophilic polymer that dehydrates blood and absorbs exudate, while its potassium ferrate-induced low pH aggregates proteins and promotes seal formation. StatSeal has demonstrated efficacy in reducing transradial access haemostasis time4. The PED-PRESS trial presented herein compared DFA access site complications utilising these two closure devices.

This prospective, randomised trial enrolled 150 patients. The procedures used ultrasound-guided DFA access. Patients were randomised to TR Band or StatSeal...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 3
Feb 2, 2026
Volume 22 Number 3
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00043 Oct 20, 2025
The great debate in vascular closure: a meta-analysis points to a clear winner
Rudolph T and Potratz M
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030 Jul 15, 2024
Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications
Jolly S and d'Entremont M
free

10.4244/EIJV7I8A146 Dec 30, 2011
Radial artery access for above the knee angioplasty: a feasibility study
Lorenzoni R et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00030 May 14, 2024
Ultrasound is not the panacea for transfemoral access complications
Jolly S and d'Entremont M
free

10.4244/EIJV16I9A130 Oct 9, 2020
A call for standardisation of vascular access in transcatheter cardiovascular procedures
Burzotta F and Dudek D
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved