Your reference journal for coronary, valvular and structural interventions

Articles

Snapshot

Feb 17, 2025

A meta-analysis of revascularisation strategies for myocardial infarction and multivessel disease; prognostic value of OCT vs μQFR for non-culprit lesion assessment in acute myocardial infarction; impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and dual antiplatelet therapy post-myocardial infarction; radial wall strain in carotid plaques and its association with plaque vulnerability; and more...

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00003 • Feb 17, 2025

Do we need to be fully complete in multivessel acute myocardial infarction?

Smits P, Paradies V

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00002 • Feb 17, 2025

The future of complete revascularisation: prioritising imaging-guided non-culprit lesion assessment

Diletti R, Elscot J

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00070 • Feb 17, 2025

Gastrointestinal protection with proton pump inhibitors in cardiovascular patients: still misunderstood and underutilised

Bhatt D

free

Meta-analysis

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00814 • Feb 17, 2025

Completeness, timing, and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Laudani C, Occhipinti G, Greco A, Spagnolo M, Giacoppo D, Capodanno D

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720 • Feb 17, 2025

Functional or anatomical assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction

Xu X, Fang C, Jiang S, Chen Y, Zhao J, Sun S, Wang Y, Li L, Huang D, Li S, Yu H, Chen T, Tan J, Liu X, Dai J, Mintz G, Yu B

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00673 • Feb 17, 2025

Effects of proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes in myocardial infarction patients treated with DAPT

Kang D, Choi K, Park H, Heo J, Park T, Lee J, Cho J, Yang J, Song Y, Choi S, Gwon H, Hahn J

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00734 • Feb 17, 2025

Angiography-based radial wall strain in carotid plaques and its association with plaque vulnerability

Suo S, Zhao H, Li C, Cao M, Wang Z, Zhang J, Han T, Guo D, Fu W, Zhou Y, Tu S

EAPCI Column

Feb 17, 2025

EAPCI focus on the Patient Advocacy Committee: an interview with the Chair, Stéphane Manzo-Silberman

free

Snapshot

Feb 3, 2025

A State-of-the-Art on mechanical circulatory support for high-risk PCI; safety data of revascularisation deferral by QFR vs FFR from the FAVOR III Europe trial; outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided PCI based on lesion complexity; FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI in patients with or without diabetes from the FLAVOUR trial; international relations of the EAPCI; and more...

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00001 • Feb 3, 2025

The pressure wire holds its ground: the debacle of QFR

Collet C, Ikeda K, Mizukami T

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00069 • Feb 3, 2025

Intracoronary imaging: routine precision or reserve for complexity?

Ali Z, Galougahi K, Stone G

free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00073 • Feb 3, 2025

Intermediate coronary stenosis evaluation in patients with or without diabetes: are FFR and IVUS equally “sweet”?

Gonzalo N, Lombardi M

free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 • Feb 3, 2025

Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Ferro E, Kim J, Lalani C, Abbott D, Yeh R

free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-01001 • Feb 3, 2025

Coronary revascularisation deferral based on quantitative flow ratio or fractional flow reserve: a post hoc analysis of the FAVOR III Europe trial

Andersen B, Holm N, Mogensen L, Maillard L, Råmunddal T, Erriquez A, Christiansen E, Escaned J, of the FAVOR III Europe study team o

Readers

Current issue