Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00042

Seeing is believing

Joost Daemen1, MD, PhD; Karol Sadowski1,2

Risk scores are essential tools in cardiovascular medicine for stratifying patients’ risk of recurrent events and guiding secondary prevention strategies. One of the well-validated scores in large cohorts of patients after myocardial infarction (MI) is the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS-2P)1. Intravascular imaging has become a cornerstone in assessing coronary plaque morphology. Among the available modalities, optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables the precise visualisation of features associated with plaque vulnerability, such as thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), a large lipid core, or plaque rupture2. Previous studies demonstrated that OCT identified the presence of high-risk plaque (HRP) in up to 48% of non-culprit arteries in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)345. Conversely, physiological lesion assessment using either conventional or angiography-based physiology appeared to only have a limited negative predictive value as HRP was determined in up to 31% of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative non-culprit lesions46. Despite the clear benefits of OCT, its use in routine clinical practice remains limited, primarily due to factors such as challenges in reimbursement and lack...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 19
Oct 6, 2025
Volume 21 Number 19
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00560 Aug 19, 2024
Letter: Identifying vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques: from theory to practice
Dimitriadis K et al
free

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00224 May 15, 2026
Letter: Non-culprit plaque rupture in STEMI – marker of vulnerability or actionable risk?
Hudzik B
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00397 Oct 21, 2022
Skating on thin ice: searching for vulnerable plaques
Prati F et al
free

Reply to the letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00287 May 15, 2026
Reply: Non-culprit plaque rupture in STEMI – marker of vulnerability or actionable risk?
Dai J et al
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01167 Jan 5, 2026
High-risk plaques: intervene early or hold the line?
Mintz G and Collet C
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00195 Apr 6, 2026
Precision over prevalence: moving beyond binary risk stratification after PCI
Vrints C
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00006 Apr 3, 2023
A novel clinical score to predict repeat coronary interventions in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis
Alfonso F and Cuesta J
free
Trending articles
334.7

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
45.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
32.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved