The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Editorial

Current controversies in carotid artery stenting

EuroInterv.2007;2:413-415.

1. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 2. Department of Surgery, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Large landmark trials (NASCET, ECST, ACAS and ACST)1-4 firmly established the indications for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic stenosis of > 50%, and asymptomatic stenosis of > 60%. Single- and multicentre randomised trials (CAVATAS, Kentucky study, Leicester study, Wallstent study, SAPPHIRE), and two recently published multicentre trials (SPACE and EVA-3S), have directly compared CEA to carotid artery stenting (CAS), and have generated widespread debate with conflicting results. At this juncture, acknowledgement of the hard work performed by these investigators, critical analysis of trial methodology, and reassessment of the utility of CAS is appropriate.

CAVATAS randomised 504 patients, 88% of ...

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Read next article

The balloon-expandable stent