Letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00542

Reply: Complex PCI in severe aortic stenosis: high risk, low reward?

Andrea Raffaele Munafò1, MD; Claudio Montalto1,2, MD

We sincerely appreciate the interest in our article “Outcomes of complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: the ASCoP registry”1 shown in the Letter to the Editor by Ktenopoulos et al2. We agree with the authors about the need to balance the procedural risk of these patients against the anticipated clinical benefit that could be achieved after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients who have severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease often present more comorbidities and challenging vascular access that translate into a higher risk of complications during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and/or PCI. Data from randomised trials and real-world registries considering this high-risk population reported a high rate of events (particularly bleeding, vascular complications, and acute kidney injury), with a significant increase in their incidence if TAVI and PCI were both performed345. The results of our registry, considering an even higher-risk population, confirmed previous evidence.

As is correctly pointed out by Ktenopoulos et al, one of the reasons that might justify the high rate of adverse events (vascular complications...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 16
Aug 18, 2025
Volume 21 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00011 Apr 21, 2025
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with complex, high-risk indicated PCI
Patterson T and McDonaugh B
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00054 Nov 18, 2024
TAVI patients with bystander coronary artery disease should receive PCI: pros and cons
Rodés-Cabau J et al
free

10.4244/EIJV10SUA11 Sep 27, 2014
Coronary artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI - why not to treat
Khawaja M et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00038 Nov 18, 2022
PCI of bystander coronary artery lesions should be performed before TAVI: pros and cons
Amat-Santos I et al
free

10.4244/EIJV10SUA10 Sep 27, 2014
Coronary artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI: why, what, when and how to treat
Stefanini G et al
free

10.4244/EIJV14I11A209 Dec 7, 2018
PCI in TAVI patients: who, why and when?
Patterson T et al
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.4

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
43.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved