Reply to the letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01076

Reply: Beta blocker withdrawal post-MI - the missed dimension of patient symptoms

Xavier Rossello1,2,3, MD, PhD; Borja Ibanez3,4, MD, PhD

We sincerely thank Dr Ahmed B. Shamsulddin for his interest1 in the results of the REBOOT-CNIC trial2, especially in our article reporting the short-term safety of beta blocker withholding or withdrawal in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients3. As he correctly points out, our findings published in EuroIntervention demonstrate that non-prescription or abrupt withdrawal of beta blockers in patients at discharge after a myocardial infarction does not result in an increased risk of major adverse events3. This was primarily reflected in our composite ischaemic endpoint, which captures events potentially linked to ischaemic risk, both in the short term (3 months) and across the study’s entire follow-up. Our results indicate that abrupt discontinuation of beta blockers is safe, even at the time of hospital discharge following acute myocardial infarction.

These findings have important clinical implications, as many patients are treated with beta blockers solely because of a prior myocardial infarction, without any other indication for their use. In patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), beta blockers can be safely withdrawn immediately without added ischaemic risk.

Dr Shamsulddin also raises...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 2
Jan 19, 2026
Volume 22 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00949 Jan 19, 2026
Letter: Beta blocker withdrawal post-MI - the missed dimension of patient symptoms
Shamsulddin A
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00050 Dec 1, 2025
Beta blockers after MI: safe for the few, still relevant for the many
Silvain J and Procopi N
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00026L Aug 27, 2021
Letter: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in France
Alfonso F et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00038 Aug 19, 2024
Impella – a treatment for all STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock? The effect of off-hours admission
Engstrøm T and Madsen J
free

Reply to the letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00287 May 15, 2026
Reply: Non-culprit plaque rupture in STEMI – marker of vulnerability or actionable risk?
Dai J et al
free
Trending articles
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
34.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
17.8

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01316 Apr 20, 2026
Electrosurgical laceration and stabilisation of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair: the ELASTA-T technique
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved