Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01174

Prevalence and prognostic impact of high ischaemic risk criteria in chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI

Valeria Raona1,2; Mauro Gitto1,2,3, MD; Angelo Oliva1,2, MD; Samantha Sartori1, PhD; Yihan Feng1, MS; Birgit Vogel1, MD; Francesca Maria Di Muro1, MD; Mauro Chiarito2,3, MD, PhD; Prakash Krishnan1, MD; Joseph Sweeny1, MD; Pedro Moreno1, MD; Annapoorna Kini1, MD; George Dangas1, MD, PhD; Samin Sharma1, MD; Roxana Mehran1, MD

Abstract

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience recurrent ischaemic events. Guidelines recommend risk stratification at the time of PCI and consideration for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in high ischaemic risk (HIR) patients.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of guideline-defined HIR criteria in a large, real-world cohort of CCS patients undergoing PCI.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed CCS patients treated with drug-eluting stents at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2012 and 2022. Per the 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on the management of CCS, HIR criteria included left main stenting, stent length >60 mm, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, bifurcation, and chronic total occlusion (CTO). Prognostic associations were assessed using multivariate Cox regression. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke.

Results: Of 15,336 CCS patients, 10,952 (71.4%) met at least one HIR criterion. Overall, HIR status and most of its individual components, with the exception of bifurcation and CTO, predicted MACCE. Increasing numbers of HIR criteria were significantly associated with higher MACCE (p for trend<0.001), as well as the individual components of death (p for trend<0.001) and MI (p for trend<0.001).

Conclusions: In a real-world CCS cohort, guideline-defined HIR status was associated with increased MACCE. However, as almost three-quarters of patients met at least one HIR criterion, risk stratification accuracy at the time of PCI may have been limited.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 7
Apr 6, 2026
Volume 22 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00195 Apr 6, 2026
Precision over prevalence: moving beyond binary risk stratification after PCI
Vrints C
free

10.4244/EIJV17I11A145 Dec 3, 2021
High bleeding risk – the clinical context matters
Mamas MA and Burgess S
free

10.4244/EIJV16I5A64 Aug 28, 2020
Defining the HBR patient – another step in the right direction
Colleran R and Urban P
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01204 Apr 6, 2026
Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Piccolo R et al

10.4244/EIJV16I7A100 Sep 18, 2020
Complex PCI: time for a universal definition
Wykrzykowska JJ and Kerkmeijer L
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00049 Jan 23, 2023
Scores and algorithms in CTO PCI: “PROGRESS” or an exercise in futility?
Sianos G and Al Nooryani A
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved