Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01204

Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Raffaele Piccolo, MD, PhD; Antonio Pio Vitale, MD; Angelo Laino, MD; Anna Franzone, MD, PhD; Plinio Cirillo, MD, PhD; Luigi Di Serafino, MD, PhD; Luca Bardi, MD; Carmen Anna Maria Spaccarotella, MD, PhD; Giovanni Esposito, MD, PhD

Abstract

Background: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed among patients undergoing myocardial revascularisation.

Aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between complex PCI and the risk of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes.

Methods: Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework. The primary analysis was restricted to studies providing adjusted risk estimates, whereas the secondary analysis included unadjusted risk estimates. The primary outcomes were myocardial infarction and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, target lesion or vessel revascularisation, and stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for prognostic studies was used to determine the level of certainty in the association between complex PCI and the risk of events.

Results: We included 290,039 patients, of whom 94,633 (33%) underwent complex PCI. Compared with non-complex PCI, patients undergoing complex PCI had a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.71, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.49-1.96), major bleeding (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CrI: 1.14-1.35), all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.12-1.32), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.29, 95% CrI: 1.15-1.46), stent thrombosis (adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CrI: 1.49-2.14), target lesion or vessel revascularisation (adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CrI: 1.58-2.50), and stroke (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.03-1.42). The posterior probability of a higher risk associated with complex versus non-complex PCI was >99% for all study outcomes. Except for stroke (which was low certainty), the certainty of evidence was moderate to high for all other outcomes. Secondary analysis, including unadjusted risk estimates, provided consistent results.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing complex PCI have an increased risk of both ischaemic and bleeding events compared with patients undergoing non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD420250656254).

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 7
Apr 6, 2026
Volume 22 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00002 Apr 6, 2026
Standardising the complexity of contemporary PCI
Giustino G
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV16I7A100 Sep 18, 2020
Complex PCI: time for a universal definition
Wykrzykowska JJ and Kerkmeijer L
free

10.4244/EIJV15I11A174 Dec 6, 2019
Antiplatelet strategies for complex PCI
Capodanno D
free

10.4244/EIJV17I7A93 Sep 20, 2021
Walking the tightrope between ischaemia and bleeding
O’Donoghue M and Patel S
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved