DOI:

False lumen stenting: uncommon stent occlusion demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound

Shinichi Furuichi*, MD; Davide Tavano, MD; Altin Palloshi, MD; Antonio Colombo, MD

A 53-year-old man with hypertension and hyperlipidaemia was referred to our hospital for a third attempt to recanalise an occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the circumflex artery (LCX). In 2003, the patient had inferolateral myocardial infarction with a triple-vessel disease. Coronary bypass grafting was performed. In March 2006, stress scintigraphy for screening showed lateral ischaemia. Coronary angiography revealed an occlusion of the right internal mammary artery to a posterolateral branch. In another centre, coronary intervention was performed for subtotal occlusion in the LCX (Figure 1A). During the procedure a guidewire entered a false lumen (Figure 1B) and finally two bare metal stents were implanted with distal TIMI 2 flow (Figure 1C). Four months later, an occlusive restenosis was found. Two previous attempts failed to reopen the vessel.

Figure 1. Initial coronary intervention for a subtotal occlusion in the LCX.

Control angiography showed occlusive ISR (Figure 2A). After crossing a guidewire and predilatation (Figure 2B), IVUS demonstrated that the distal stent was completely positioned in the false lumen and the guidewire re-entered the true lumen 18 mm distal to the stent distal edge. (Figure 2a-e).

Figure 2. Control angiography with IVUS revealing occlusive in-stent restenosis.

The true lumen (*) was observed out of stent struts. Angiography with IVUS transducer positioned at the re-entry point (Figure 3A, arrow) was performed for a guide to optimal stenting and three sirolimus eluting stents (SES) were implanted with excellent angiographic result (Figure 3B). Post-intervention IVUS confirmed SES covered entire false lumen and connected the proximal true lumen with the distal one. The vessel was open at four months follow-up (Figure 3C).

Figure 3. Coronary angiography with implantation of 3 sirolimus-eluting stents.

Volume 4 Number 2
Aug 20, 2008
Volume 4 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00196 Mar 16, 2026
Is the stress aortic valve index a fractional flow reserve for the stenotic aortic valve?
Kern M and Antoku D
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00512 Mar 16, 2026
Transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis
Jacobsen M et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00892 Mar 16, 2026
Extended-length sheaths for TAVI in hostile aortic anatomy
Kobari Y et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00985 Mar 16, 2026
Risk of leaflet avulsion after UNICORN leaflet modification
Khokhar A et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01068 Mar 16, 2026
Three-dimensional intracardiac echo-guided transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement
Swaminathan S et al

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00161 Mar 10, 2026
Long-term Clinical Benefit after Radiofrequency Renal Denervation: Pooled 36-Month Results from the SPYRAL Clinical Program
Kandzari D et al
open access
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved