Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00195

Five-year follow-up of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the EVOQUE valve

Kevin Millar1,2, BAO, MB, BCh; Ali Husain3, MBBCh; Robert Moss1,2, MD; Robert H. Boone1,2, MD; John G. Webb1,2,4, MD

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is an alternative treatment modality for a subset of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who are unsuitable for traditional surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. One TTVR device, the EVOQUE valve (Edwards Lifesciences), has recently become the first TTVR device to receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Reported midterm outcomes of the EVOQUE valve have been favourable, demonstrating reductions in tricuspid regurgitation, symptom burden, and heart failure hospitalisation rates12. However, there remains a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following TTVR with the EVOQUE valve. A 69-year-old female patient with a background history of rheumatic heart disease, mitral valve commissurotomy, and subsequent mechanical mitral valve replacement (St. Jude Medical 25 mm mechanical prosthesis) presented with New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV dyspnoea, refractory peripheral oedema, ascites, and multiple recent heart failure hospitalisations. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50%, a dilated right ventricle (RV; basal diameter of 46 mm) with mildly reduced function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] of 9 mm),...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 22
Nov 14, 2025
Volume 21 Number 22
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00341 Jan 8, 2026
Retrieval of a stuck transcatheter aortic valve device via left ventricular apex and transapical implantation
Yasuda M et al
open access

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00053 Jan 5, 2026
The quiescent volcanoes that don't harm anymore
Prati F and Biccirè F
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01153 Jan 5, 2026
Computed tomography angiography-derived microvascular resistance: is less always more?
Gallinoro E and Barbato E
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00051 Jan 5, 2026
QFR in clinical practice: raising the bar for quality and reproducibility
Lansky A
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01167 Jan 5, 2026
High-risk plaques: intervene early or hold the line?
Mintz G and Collet C
free

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00263 Jan 5, 2026
Endomyocardial biopsy
Fabris E et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00648 Jan 5, 2026
Long-term clinical outcomes of non-culprit plaque rupture in STEMI
Zhao J et al

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00671 Jan 5, 2026
Non-invasive assessment of microcirculatory resistance by coronary computed tomography angiography
Deng D et al
open access

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00668 Jan 5, 2026
Repeatability and quality assessment of QFR in the FAVOR III Europe trial: the REPEAT-QFR study
Kristensen S et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved