Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00195

Five-year follow-up of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the EVOQUE valve

Kevin Millar1,2, BAO, MB, BCh; Ali Husain3, MBBCh; Robert Moss1,2, MD; Robert H. Boone1,2, MD; John G. Webb1,2,4, MD

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is an alternative treatment modality for a subset of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who are unsuitable for traditional surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. One TTVR device, the EVOQUE valve (Edwards Lifesciences), has recently become the first TTVR device to receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Reported midterm outcomes of the EVOQUE valve have been favourable, demonstrating reductions in tricuspid regurgitation, symptom burden, and heart failure hospitalisation rates12. However, there remains a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following TTVR with the EVOQUE valve. A 69-year-old female patient with a background history of rheumatic heart disease, mitral valve commissurotomy, and subsequent mechanical mitral valve replacement (St. Jude Medical 25 mm mechanical prosthesis) presented with New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV dyspnoea, refractory peripheral oedema, ascites, and multiple recent heart failure hospitalisations. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50%, a dilated right ventricle (RV; basal diameter of 46 mm) with mildly reduced function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] of 9 mm),...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 22
Nov 14, 2025
Volume 21 Number 22
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00453 Jul 6, 2026
AnchorMan versus Watchman 2.5: a randomised comparison in left atrial appendage closure
Garot P and Nielsen-Kudsk J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00011 Jul 6, 2026
Comparing transcatheter aortic valves: time to look beyond simplistic categorisations
Blackman D and Maznyczka A
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00158 Jul 6, 2026
Prosthesis-patient mismatch with intra-annular self-expanding valves: an analysis of the PORTICO IDE trial
Fontana G et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00315 Jul 6, 2026
Validation of the VARC-HBR consensus for defining high bleeding risk in TAVI
Singh M et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00271 Jul 6, 2026
Outcomes of percutaneous mechanical aspiration in left-sided infective endocarditis
Lugo-Fagundo NS et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00128 Jul 6, 2026
Concomitant transfemoral aortic and mitral valve replacement
Lianos I et al
Trending articles
334.7

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
45.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
32.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved