13. Percutaneous intervention for structural heart disease

TRIGUARD cerebral embolic protection device during TAVI

REFLECT I
Objective
to investigate the safety and efficacy of TriGuard HDH (TG) cerebral embolic protection device compared to controls in patients undergoing TAVI
Study
prospective, multicentre, single-blind 2:1 (TG vs no TG) randomised trial
Population
patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI
Endpoints
safety endpoint: composite of all-cause death, stroke, severe bleeding, stage 2-3 acute kidney injury, coronary obstruction, major vascular complications, valve related dysfunction at 30 days. efficacy endpoint: all-cause death or any stroke at 30 days, NIHSS or MoCA worsening at 30 days and MRI-lesions.
Conclusion
TriGuard cerebral protection is safe but did not meet the primary effectiveness endpoint compared to controls
Lansky et al. European Heart Journal. 2021;42:2670-79
Receive our newsletter


The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved