13. Percutaneous intervention for structural heart disease

TAVR versus SAVR

NOTION 5 years
Objective
to report the 5-year clinical outcomes of TAVR compared to SAVR for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis
Study
multicentre, randomised study
Population
patients with severe aortic stenosis (self expanding CoreValve prosthesis)
Endpoints
composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, MI at 5 years
Conclusion
there are no significant differences in clinical adverse outcomes between TAVR and surgery for treatment of severe aortic stenosis at 5 years
Thyregod et al. Circulation. 2019;139:2714-23
Receive our newsletter


The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved