13. Percutaneous intervention for structural heart disease

Left atrial appendage closure vs direct oral anticoagulants

PRAGUE 17
Objective
to assess the clinical adverse outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC’s) compared to left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation
Study
investigation-initiated, prospective, multicentre non-inferiority randomised trial (margin 5%)
Population
high risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASC ≥3) with atrial fibrillation
Endpoints
stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, cardiovascular death, major or non major clinical relevant bleeding or procedure/ device related complications
Conclusion
LAAC was non-inferior to DOAC in preventing adverse events in high- risk patients with atrial fibrillation
Osmancik et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:3122-35
Receive our newsletter


The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved