1. Drug-eluting and bare metal stents

BP-SES vs. PP-EES vs. PP-SES

ISAR-TEST 4: 10 years
Objective
to compare the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer based sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES, YOKON CHOICE) vs. permanent polymer-based everolimus-eluting stents (PP-EES, XIENCE) vs. early generation permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (PP-SES, CYPHER) during 10-year follow-up
Study
2 centre, prospective randomised trial
Population
– patients with ischemic symptoms and ≥50% de novo stenosis – excluded: left main and cardiogenic shock
Endpoints
MACE as death, MI or target lesion revascularisation at 10 years
Conclusion
BP-SES and PP-EES showed comparable clinical outcomes at 10 years. PP-SES was associated with higher adverse event rate at 10 years
Kufner et al. Circulation. 2019;139:325-33
Receive our newsletter


The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved