4. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs DES

COMPARE-ABSORB
Objective
to investigate the 1-year clinical outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation compared with metallic DES implantation for treatment of patients with high-risk of restenosis
Study
prospective, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial
Population
patients with symptomatic heart disease and high-risk of restenosis
Endpoints
target lesion failure as composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI or clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation at 1 year
Conclusion
BVS was non-inferior to EES at 1 year in terms of target lesion failure for treatment of patients with high-risk of restenosis. The risk of stent thrombosis and target vessel MI was significantly higher in BVS treated patients
Smits et al. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:645-53
Receive our newsletter


The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved