Sayan Sen

Showing 1-13 of 13 articles

Assessing coronary disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis: the need for a ‘valid’ gold standard for validation studies?

Sen S, Ahmad Y, Davies J

January 19, 2018 | 10.4244/EIJV13I13A240

Day case TAVI: is this a reality?

Jabbour R, Frame A, Sen S, Malik I, Mikhail G, Frame A

October 20, 2017 | 10.4244/EIJV13I8A135

Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended to a coronary stenosis on the index of microcirculatory resistance. Implications for the invasive assessment of microcirculatory function in ischaemic heart disease

Echavarría-Pinto M, van de Hoef T, Nijjer S, Gonzalo N, Nombela-Franco L, Ibáñez B, Sen S, Petraco R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Núñez-Gil I, Cerrato E, Salinas P, Quirós A, Garcia-Garcia H, Fernandez Ortiz A, Macaya C, Davies J, Piek J, Escaned J

October 20, 2017 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00525

Coronary interventions

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold radial expansion and conformation compared to a metallic platform: insights from in vitro expansion in a coronary artery lesion model

Foin N, Lee R, Bourantas C, Mattesini A, Soh N, Lim J, Torii R, Ng J, Liang L, Caiazzo G, Fabris E, Kilic I, Onuma Y, Low A, Nijjer S, Sen S, Petraco R, Lamee R, Davies J, Di Mario C, Wong P, Serruys P

September 18, 2016 | 10.4244/EIJV12I7A138

Coronary interventions

Basal stenosis resistance index derived from simultaneous pressure and flow velocity measurements

van de Hoef T, Petraco R, van Lavieren M, Nijjer S, Nolte F, Sen S, Echavarría-Pinto M, Henriques J, Koch K, Baan Jr J, de Winter R, Siebes M, Spaan J, Thijssen J, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, Davies J, Piek J

June 10, 2016 | 10.4244/EIJV12I2A33

Coronary interventions

Fractional flow reserve and minimum Pd/Pa ratio during intravenous adenosine infusion: very similar but not always the same

Echavarría-Pinto M, Petraco R, van de Hoef T, Gonzalo N, Nijjer S, Tarkin J, Ibáñez B, Sen S, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Núñez-Gil I, Nombela-Franco L, Alfonso F, Fernandez Ortiz A, Macaya C, Piek J, Davies J, Escaned J

January 20, 2016 | 10.4244/EIJY14M10_09

Head-to-head comparison of basal stenosis resistance index, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve: diagnostic accuracy for stenosis-specific myocardial ischaemia

van de Hoef T, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, Sen S, Petraco R, van Lavieren M, Echavarría-Pinto M, Nolte F, Nijjer S, Chamuleau S, Voskuil M, van Eck-Smit B, Verberne H, Henriques J, Koch K, de Winter R, Spaan J, Siebes M, Thijssen J, Davies J, Piek J

December 20, 2015 | 10.4244/EIJY14M08_17

Assessment of lesion functional significance with virtual FFR – are we going with the flow?

Foin N, Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Davies J

September 28, 2014 | 10.4244/EIJV10I5A94

Optimising stenting strategy in bifurcation lesions with insights from in vitro bifurcation models

Foin N, Mattesini A, Ghione M, Dall’Ara G, Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Sgueglia G, Davies J, Di Mario C

March 3, 2014

Tools & Techniques Clinical: Optimising stenting strategy in bifurcation lesions with insights from in vitro bifurcation models

Foin N, Mattesini A, Ghione M, Dall’Ara G, Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Sgueglia G, Davies J, Di Mario C

November 29, 2013 | 10.4244/EIJV9I7A144

Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry

Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress K, Echavarría-Pinto M, Lockie T, Khawaja M, Cuevas C, Foin N, Broyd C, Foale R, Hadjiloizou N, Malik I, Mikhail G, Sethi A, Kaprielian R, Baker C, Lefroy D, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Khan M, Hughes A, Francis D, Mayet J, Di Mario C, Redwood S, Davies J

May 21, 2013 | 10.4244/EIJV9I1A14

Maximal expansion capacity with current DES platforms: a critical factor for stent selection in the treatment of left main bifurcations?

Foin N, Sen S, Allegria E, Petraco R, Nijjer S, Francis D, Di Mario C, Davies J

March 22, 2013 | 10.4244/EIJV8I11A200

Hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy: implications for enhancing universal adoption of physiology-guided coronary revascularisation

Petraco R, Park J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Malik I, Echavarría-Pinto M, Asrress K, Nam C, Macías E, Foale R, Sethi A, Mikhail G, Kaprielian R, Baker C, Lefroy D, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Khan M, Gonzalo N, Hughes A, Francis D, Mayet J, Di Mario C, Redwood S, Escaned J, Koo B, Davies J

February 22, 2013 | 10.4244/EIJV8I10A179

1

Latest news

EAPCI/ACVC consensus on pVADs, coronary physiology mini focus, a new analysis from the COAPT trial, patient selection for tricuspid interventions and more…

Treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure

Marco Metra et al

This Week's JAA's: Principles and Pitfalls in CFT, Brachial access for PCI....

Coronary flow capacity: where to next?

Nils P. Johnson

Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on pVADs

EuroIntervention's new impact factor!

STATE OF THE ART

Completeness of Revascularisation in ACS Patients with Multivessel Disease

Valeria Paradies et al.

Valvular disease