Coronary interventions
Impact of Bioresorbable Scaffold Design Characteristics on Local Hemodynamic Forces - an ex vivo Assessment with Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations January 21, 2020 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00657
Showing 1-13 of 13 articles
Coronary interventions
Early strut protrusion and late neointima thickness in the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold: a serial wall shear stress analysis up to five years July 19, 2019 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00381
Coronary interventions
Preclinical evaluation of a thin-strut bioresorbable scaffold (ArterioSorb): acute-phase invasive imaging assessment and hemodynamic implication. July 9, 2019 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01190
Coronary interventions
Validation of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography based software to calculate Fractional Flow Reserve: Fast Assessment of STenosis severity (FAST)-study May 14, 2019 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00466
Coronary interventions
Impact of plaque type and side branch geometry on side branch compromise after provisional stent implantation: a simulation study June 2, 2017 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00498
Coronary interventions
Five-year follow-up of underexpanded and overexpanded bioresorbable scaffolds: self-correction and impact on shear stress April 20, 2017 | 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00081
In vivo assessment of the relationship between shear stress and necrotic core in early and advanced coronary artery disease
December 27, 2013 | 10.4244/EIJV9I8A165
Virtual bench testing of new generation coronary stents: why would we want to publish this paper?
July 29, 2011 | 10.4244/EIJV7I3A50
High shear stress induces a strain increase in human coronary plaques over a 6-month period
May 17, 2011 | 10.4244/EIJV7I1A20